- Bahrain Grand Prix
Ecclestone backs Bahrain Grand Prix go-ahead
ESPNF1 Staff
December 10, 2011
« Senna confident for 2012 despite narrowing options
| Red Bull still committed to cost cutting - Horner »
Bernie Ecclestone: "It's not correct to go moving into somebody's country and try to change them" © Sutton Images
Enlarge
Bernie Ecclestone would need to be presented with "incontrovertible evidence" of unacceptable things happening in Bahrain to reconsider next year's grand prix, but is hoping for a problem-free race in April.
The 2011 grand prix was postponed and eventually cancelled against a backdrop of international condemnation at the political situation inside the kingdom and unease over the dates among the teams. The 2012 race has been approved for April 22 despite ongoing political tensions in the country and more anti-government demonstrations at Manama's symbolic Pearl Square roundabout this week.
The roundabout had been the focus for protests earlier this year when the government enforced martial law to crack down on the demonstrators. At least 24 people were killed in the unrest according to official figures and an inquiry said excessive police force had resulted in deaths, mistreatment and torture of civilians.
Human rights organisations also reported that doctors were put in prison for treating protestors, but in an interview with the Guardian Ecclestone said he had been given assurances that was not the case.
"We have been assured that this is not what's happening," he said. "In fact they had a report made, allegedly independent. What did the report say? Yes, there were instances or whatever, but ... I wanted to go out there. I was happy to go. I'd like to go into the prison or the hospital or whatever and ask: 'What actually happened?'"
He added: "I have asked [to go out there]. They said, 'No problem.' The danger is you go out there and they pick you up in a limousine and take you to the best hotel and take you to dinner and then put you back on the aeroplane."
Asked what he would do if he was presented with "incontrovertible evidence that unacceptable things were still happening", Ecclestone said: "We'd have to give it some serious thought then. But we've been to Argentina when there's been big dramas. There's been dramas in Brazil. Bad things happen there. I think you can look anywhere now and it's not all good. You can't really hold England up as being all good, can you? There have been some terrible atrocities that we committed."
However, Ecclestone hinted that not going to Bahrain was an option and added that he had pulled F1 out of South Africa during apartheid.
"Wherever I go, the minute you get off the plane, the minute you go into somebody's country, you've got to respect exactly what their way of life is - their religion, their laws or whatever. It's not correct to go moving into somebody's country and try to change them. Don't go. If you know something's wrong, stay away.
"We pulled out of South Africa years ago [in 1985] because of apartheid. I witnessed things that had happened there which upset me. I thought: 'That ain't the way to go on.' I hope we go to Bahrain and there's no trouble - the race goes on, the public are happy and there are no dramas. That's what I hope."
© ESPN EMEA Ltd.
Feeds: ESPN Staff
Comments: 4
« Senna confident for 2012 despite narrowing options
| Red Bull still committed to cost cutting - Horner »
Products you might like at espnshop.co.uk
|
| ||||||
| Comments have now been closed for this article |
||||||
ESPN Staff
Very few F1 fans really care if there is a race held in Bahrain or not. It is all about that big pay check for Bernie. As far as South Africa is concerned; F1 raced there long after every other major sporting organization pulled out, as well as most major corporations and advertisers. Back then the story was all about how holding F1 races in SA could lead to positive changes. In fact nothing positive at all happened until AFTER F1 stopped racing in SA.
Posted byBernie has been and always will be about money. He could give a c**p about the country, it's treatment of people or their "troubles" so long as he gets paid. How much more money do you need?? I wish I could say I was surprised but no I'm not. Sigh.
Posted byHow much you want to bet theose "assurances" were on the back of a huge check!
Posted byEven while defending Bahrain (boring track, boring landscape, terrible everything imo) he has to backhand Britain? Just don't get this man, clearly states that he has queries about the legitimacy of the report, the fact he hasn't gone out there himself. Can't follow his train of thought about this one.